Sherrie Pressley, AKA Sherrie Teague v. Capital Credit & Collection Service, Inc., an Oregon Corporation

Good Law
760 F.2d 922·1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 31127
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 198584-3559California1,544 words

Opinion

Opinion

Capital Credit and Collection Services, Inc. (Capital Credit) has appealed a judgment awarding Sherrie Pressley $100 statutory damages, following the granting of summary judgment in an action under the Fair Debt Collection Practice Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq., for Capital Credit’s failure to comply with section 1692e(ll) in a notice to Pressley demanding payment of a debt. We reverse and remand for dismissal of the action.

Facts and Proceedings in District Court

The material facts are not in dispute. Sherrie Pressley (also known as Sherrie Teague) owed $126.07 to General Telco Credit Union. The credit union assigned its claim to Capital Credit, a debt collection agency. On March 10, 1982, Capital Credit sent a notice to Pressley, which reads:

On March 8, 1983, Pressley brought this action for statutory damages, claiming that the notice from Capital Credit violated the disclosure requirement of 15 U.S.C. § 1692e(ll), which reads:

After stipulating for trial before a United States magistrate, both parties moved for summary judgment. In granting Pressley’s motion the magistrate found that Capital Credit’s notice did not comply with the statute, relying upon three cases…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.