Defense Language Institute, Presidio of Monterey, California v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, National Federation of Federal Employees, Intervenor-Respondent. Federal Labor Relations Authority v. Defense Language Institute, Presidio of Monterey, California

Good Law
767 F.2d 1398·120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2013·1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 21704
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 8, 198584-7498California2,824 words

Opinion

Opinion

767 F.2d 1398 120 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2013 DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE, Presidio of Monterey, California, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Respondent, National Federation of Federal Employees, Intervenor-Respondent. FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. DEFENSE LANGUAGE INSTITUTE, Presidio of Monterey, California, Respondent. Nos. 84-7498, 84-7610. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 11, 1985. Decided Aug. 8, 1985. Frederic Freilicher, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for Defense Language Institute. Robert J. Englehart, Washington, D.C., for Federal Labor Relations Authority. On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Before SNEED, TANG and CANBY, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 Defense Language Institute (the Institute) petitions for review of a decision and order by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (the Authority) holding that a proposal by the National Federation of Federal Employees (the union) comes within the Institute's statutory duty to bargain. The proposal would require the Institute to correct all in-house cost estimate data, compiled to determine the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.