Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,280, 13 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1198, Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,718 Herbert D. Underhill v. Carlos Royal, Herbert D. Underhill v. National Mortgage Exchange, Inc.

Good Law
769 F.2d 1426
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 29, 198584-6210California4,876 words

Opinion

Opinion

769 F.2d 1426 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,280, 13 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 1198 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 70,718 Herbert D. UNDERHILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Carlos ROYAL, et al., Defendants-Appellants. Herbert D. UNDERHILL, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. NATIONAL MORTGAGE EXCHANGE, INC., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 84-6210, 84-6211. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1985. Decided Aug. 29, 1985. Matthew V. Herron, Meisenheimer & Herron, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees. Gregory A. Akers, Akers & Williams, James F. Stiven, San Diego, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before WALLACE, TANG, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. TANG, Circuit Judge: 1 California Mortgage Exchange, California Mortgage Exchange of Southern California and the principal shareholder of both companies, Carlos Royal, appeal from a judgment entered against them after a jury trial. These defendants were found liable for violations of federal and state securities laws. The plaintiffs cross-appeal the jury's finding that a director of one of the corporations, Max Hollis, was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.