Papago Tribal Utility Authority v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors. Arizona Public Service Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Arizona Power Authority, Intervenors. Arizona Power Authority, Electrical District No. One, Electrical District No. 3, Electrical District No. 6, Electrical District No. 7, Roosevelt Irrigation District, Buckeye Water Conservation District, Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

773 F.2d 1056 PAPAGO TRIBAL UTILITY AUTHORITY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent, Arizona Public Service Company, Intervenors. ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY, Petitioner, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent, Arizona Power Authority, et al., Intervenors. ARIZONA POWER AUTHORITY, Electrical District No. One, Electrical District No. 3, Electrical District No. 6, Electrical District No. 7, Roosevelt Irrigation District, Buckeye Water Conservation District, Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1, Petitioners, v. FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION, Respondent. Nos. 84-7012, 84-7119, 84-7155, 84-7278 and 84-7310. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 14, 1984. Decided Oct. 10, 1985. Arnold D. Berkeley, Richard I. Chaifetz, Washington, D.C., for petitioners. Arlene Pianko Groner, Washington, D.C., William H. Satterfield, Gen. Counsel, Jerome M. Feit, Sol., Arlene Pianko Groner, Atty., F.E.R.C., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Melvin Richter, James T. McManus, Wright & Talisman, Daniel J. Wright, Brian J. McManus, Reid & Priest, Washington, D.C., for intervenors. On Petition…