39 Fair empl.prac.cas. 764, 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,777 Sherman Haddock v. Board of Dental Examiners of California, Lawrence A. Puccinelli, David W. Hamrock, Edward J. Hoefling, Knud Flygenring, Takeyasu, J. Frisch, David Maudsley, Thomas M. Stewart, Helyn C. Luechauer, Marlene Schultz, Peter Young, Jr., Paul F. Senise, Kent Madsen, Adkins, Shirley J. Bailey

777 F.2d 462 39 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 764 , 38 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 35,777 Sherman HADDOCK, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. BOARD OF DENTAL EXAMINERS OF CALIFORNIA, Lawrence A. Puccinelli, David W. Hamrock, Edward J. Hoefling, Knud Flygenring, Takeyasu, J. Frisch, David Maudsley, Thomas M. Stewart, Helyn C. Luechauer, Marlene Schultz, Peter Young, Jr., Paul F. Senise, Kent Madsen, Adkins, Shirley J. Bailey, Defendants/Appellees. No. 83-6127. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 6, 1985. Decided Nov. 26, 1985. Sherman Haddock, pro. per. Stephen A. Mills, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before ANDERSON, BEEZER, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: 1 This case raises the question of whether the licensing activities of the appellee Board of Dental Examiners of the State of California (hereinafter "the Board") come within the terms of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended in 1972, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. (hereinafter "the Act"). The appellant, a black male, claims that the Board intentionally lowered his dental…