United States v. Clarence Jay Crozier, Manuel Isadore Pine, Alan Terry Stein, and Florence Margaret Wolke

Good Law
777 F.2d 1376·1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 25177
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 5, 198581-1345, 81-1355 and 81-1484California4,280 words

Opinion

Opinion

Solomon, J.

This case is before the court on a remand from the Supreme Court of the United States.

On an interlocutory appeal, we affirmed the district court’s orders suppressing evidence seized from the defendants’ residences and we vacated its order restraining defendants Clarence Crozier and Florence Wolke from disposing of much of their real and personal property.

The Supreme Court vacated our decision and remanded the case to us for reconsideration in light of three recent cases: Segura v. United States, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3380 , 82 L.Ed.2d 599 (1984); United States v. Leon, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 , reh’g denied, — U.S. —, 105 S.Ct. 52 , 82 L.Ed.2d 942 (1984); and United States v. Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($8,850) in U.S. Currency, 461 U.S. 555 , 103 S.Ct. 2005 , 76 L.Ed.2d 143 (1983). United States v. Crozier, — U.S. —, 104 S.Ct. 3575 , 82 L.Ed.2d 873 (1984).

Facts

On April 9, 1980, drug enforcement agents believing that Crozier and Stein were manufacturing narcotics, arrested them. At the time, they were traveling in separate automobiles.

Agents then proceeded to Crozier’s residence, which he shares with defendant Wolke. The agents entered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.