United States v. Antoinette Dela Espriella, United States of America v. Margaret Caro, United States of America v. Alberto Dela Espriella, United States of America v. Pablo Chapoy, United States of America v. Gustavo Ricardo Ronderos

Good Law
781 F.2d 1432·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22114
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 10, 198685-5255California2,592 words

Opinion

Opinion

781 F.2d 1432 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antoinette DELA ESPRIELLA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Margaret CARO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alberto DELA ESPRIELLA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Pablo CHAPOY, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gustavo RICARDO RONDEROS, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 84-5252 to 85-5255, and 84-5298. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Aug. 7, 1985. Feb. 10, 1986. Brian Sun, Asst. U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Phillip G. Trad, Marina Del Rey, Cal., for Antoinette Dela Espriella. Marlene Gerdts, Glendale, Cal., for Caro. Joseph F. Walsh, Esq., Los Angeles, Cal., for Alberto Dela Espriella. Stephen R. Kahn, Los Angeles, Cal., for Chapoy. Joseph T. Vodnoy, Los Angeles, Cal., for Ronderos. Consolidated Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges, and SOLOMON, Senior District Judge. * CANBY, Circuit Judge: 1 These consolidated appeals challenge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.