Loren Christian Brandes, Plaintiff/appellant/cross-Appellee v. United States of America, Defendants/appellees/cross-Appellants

Good Law
783 F.2d 895·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 22672
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 25, 198684-2520, 84-2604California1,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

Loren Brandes appeals from the district court’s determination that Brandes was the sole cause of the automobile accident in question and from the denial of his motion for a new trial. Included in this appeal is a cross-appeal from the United States regarding the district court’s decision that Rue Dann, the driver of the government vehicle, was a federal employee when the accident occurred. Because we find that Dann was not a federal employee, the district court lacked jurisdiction over the subject matter of the case and its decisions are therefore vacated.

I. FACTS

This suit arose from a traffic accident near Sausalito, California, involving Loren Brandes and Rue Dann. At the time of the accident, Dann was operating a United States Government vehicle. Dann’s fiance, Dr. John Ziegler, had accepted a job with the Veterans’ Administration (VA) in San Francisco and Ziegler and Dann had come to California to search for a house. To facilitate their househunting, they were issued a United States Government vehicle.

The accident occurred on June 7, 1981, while Dann was househunting. The vehicles collided while traveling in the northbound lane of U.S. 101. As a result of the accident,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.