Dr. Charles Milo Connick v. Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America & College Retirement Equities Fund

Good Law
784 F.2d 1018·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23017
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 14, 1986CA 84-6556California2,202 words

Opinion

Opinion

Solomon, J.

Appellant, Dr. Charles Milo Connick, upon his retirement demanded a lump sum payment for his annuity contributions and the accrued interest. Appellees, Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America and College Retirement Equities Fund (TIAA-CREF), refused to make the lump sum payment because the annuity contracts specifically state that there are no provisions for cash surrender. Connick filed an action for declaratory judgment against TIAA-CREF in which he alleged various state law claims, including breach of contract, reformation, unconscionability, misrepresentation, and changed circumstances. Connick also alleged breach of fiduciary duties, an ERISA violation. 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 , et seq. The district court granted TIAA-CREF’s motions to dismiss and for summary judgment. On appeal, Connick contends that the district court’s action was an abuse of discretion and erroneous. We affirm.

FACTS

TIAA is a non-profit, legal reserve life insurance company. It provides a fixed retirement annuity for employees of institutions of higher education. The funds are invested in mortgages, real estate, bonds, and other debt securities. CREF is a companion non-profit organization. It…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.