United States v. Marvin Jenkins, United States of America v. Ross Prock, United States of America v. Rich White

Good Law
785 F.2d 1387·20 Fed. R. Serv. 192·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 23397
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMarch 27, 198684-1267, 84-1268 and 84-1281California4,031 words

Opinion

Opinion

Canby, J.

This case arises from a scheme to obtain by fraudulent means financing insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) under the Title 1 Mobile Home Loan Program. The government alleged that, by altering and inflating manufacturer invoices and by bribing employees of Sherwood & Roberts (S & R), an FHA-insured lender, appellants Marvin Jenkins, Ross Prock and Rick White sought to obtain government-insured financing for mobile homes they were selling through Young American Mobile Home Sales of Las Vegas, Nevada. Appellants were stockholders, officers and employees of Young American.

The bribes, in the form of kickbacks of several hundred dollars for each loan processed, were intended to facilitate easy loan approval by S & R. By altering manufacturer invoices, Young American could secure for its customers insured financing for “extras” not normally permitted under Title 1 guidelines.

Appellants were tried on an indictment that charged thirteen counts of making false statements to obtain loans insured by the FHA, 18 U.S.C. § 1010 (1982), and one count of conspiring to defraud the government by such statements, 18 U.S.C. § 371 (1982). A jury found all three guilty of conspiracy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.