Lafarge Conseils Et Etudes, S.A. v. Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp., Defendant-Counterclaimant/appellant v. The Howard P. Foley Company, Counterdefendant/appellee

Bad Law
791 F.2d 1334·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26060
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 11, 198685-1789California5,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

791 F.2d 1334 LAFARGE CONSEILS ET ETUDES, S.A., Plaintiff, v. KAISER CEMENT & GYPSUM CORP., Defendant-Counterclaimant/Appellant, v. The HOWARD P. FOLEY COMPANY, Counterdefendant/Appellee. Nos. 84-2764, 84-2765, 85-1789 and 85-1790. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1986. Decided June 11, 1986. Blecher, Collins & Weinstein, Maxwell M. Blecher, Les J. Weinstein, Christopher Layne, Los Angeles, Cal., for Kaiser Cement & Gypsum Corp. Joe Sims, Robert F. McDermott, Jr., Kathryn M. Fenton, Jones, Day, Reavis & Pogue, Washington, D.C., for counterdefendant/appellee. On Appeal From the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before: POOLE, BEEZER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges BEEZER, Circuit Judge: 1 Kaiser Cement Corporation appeals from the district court's denial of its motions to vacate the arbitration award and to set aside a judgment confirming that award. Foley's claims against Kaiser for breach of contract were arbitrated under a contract provision. The panel awarded Foley $3,786,194. 1 Kaiser's first motion to vacate the award was denied, and Kaiser now seeks to vacate the award and set aside…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.