Kern Oil and Refining Co., Plaintiff/counter-Defendant-Appellee v. Tenneco Oil Co., Defendant/counterclaimant-Appellant

Good Law
792 F.2d 1380·1 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 651·5 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 592·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 26361
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 24, 198684-6268, 84-6367 and 84-6482California5,012 words

Opinion

Opinion

Beezer, J.

Kern Oil & Refining Co. filed an action against Tenneco Oil Company, seeking restitution for payments made to Tenneco under an alleged mistake of fact. Tenneco filed various counterclaims, including a claim for lost profits arising out of Kern Oil’s failure to supply crude oil to Tenneco. In No. 84-6268, Tenneco challenges the district court’s judgment in favor of Kern Oil on the restitution claim. In No. 84-6482, Tenneco seeks reversal of the district court’s order granting attorneys’ fees to Kern Oil. In No. 84-6367, Tenneco challenges the dismissal of the lost profits counterclaim for lack of prosecution. We affirm.

I

Background

Kern Oil is a general partnership doing business in California. Tenneco is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Texas. On May 19, 1977, Tenneco entered into a contract to sell crude oil to Kern Oil. Tenneco agreed to sell its production from twenty-four specified leases to Kern Oil. The contract contained the following terms:

(emphasis added). The primary issue in this case is the interpretation of those terms.

In the mid-1970s, the Federal Energy Administration adopted a complex system to regulate the price of domestic…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.