NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 6 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JEFFREY ANTHONY FRANKLIN, No. 17-16147

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 4:13-cv-03777-YGR

v.

MEMORANDUM*

G. D. LEWIS, Warden; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted February 4, 2020**

Before: FERNANDEZ, SILVERMAN, and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges.

Jeffrey Anthony Franklin, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se from the

district court’s summary judgment in his action alleging federal and state law

claims arising from the alleged withholding of his legal mail. We have jurisdiction

under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). In his opening brief, Franklin fails to challenge specifically any of the

grounds for the district court’s summary judgment. Therefore, Franklin has

waived any challenge to summary judgment. See Indep. Towers of Wash. v.

Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003) (“[W]e review only issues which

are argued specifically and distinctly in a party’s opening brief.” (citation and

internal quotation marks omitted)); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th

Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief

are waived).

We do not consider Franklin’s arguments relating to his motion for

reconsideration because that issue is outside the scope of this appeal.

AFFIRMED.

2 17-16147