Nathalie Norris v. Arizona Governing Committee For Tax Deferred Annuity And Deferred Compensation Plans

Good Law
796 F.2d 1119·40 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 36,371·41 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 820·7 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1913·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 27969
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 11, 198685-1640California2,920 words

Opinion

Opinion

796 F.2d 1119 41 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 820 , 40 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,371 , 55 USLW 2132 , 7 Employee Benefits Ca 1913 Nathalie NORRIS, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. ARIZONA GOVERNING COMMITTEE FOR TAX DEFERRED ANNUITY AND DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLANS, STATE OF ARIZONA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-1640. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 10, 1986. Decided Aug. 11, 1986. Amy J. Gittler, Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants. Barry A. McNaughton, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before PREGERSON, POOLE and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. PREGERSON, Circuit Judge. 1 In Norris v. Arizona Governing Committee, 486 F.Supp. 645, 652 (D.Ariz.1980), the district court held that the State of Arizona's deferred compensation plan violated Title VII and ordered retroactive relief. We affirmed. Norris v. Arizona Governing Committee for Tax Deferred Annuity, 671 F.2d 330, 336 (9th Cir.1982). The Supreme Court affirmed on the merits, but held that we erred in granting retroactive relief. Arizona Governing Committee for Tax…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.