Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,994, 21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1248 Jennie Vucinich v. Paine, Webber, Jackson & Curtis, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and Philip F. Moore

Good Law
803 F.2d 454
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 23, 198685-5631California4,216 words

Opinion

Opinion

803 F.2d 454 Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,994, 21 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1248 Jennie VUCINICH, Plaintiff/Appellant, v. PAINE, WEBBER, JACKSON & CURTIS, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and Philip F. Moore, Defendants/Appellees. No. 85-5631. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 10, 1986. Decided Oct. 23, 1986. Allen J. Capeloto, Richard L. Rubin, Capeloto & Rubin, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff/appellant. George M. Garvey, Munger, Tolles & Olson, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants/appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before CANBY, REINHARDT, and JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judges. NOONAN, Circuit Judge. 1 Jennie Vucinich brought this action against Paine, Webber, Jackson, and Curtis, Inc. (Paine, Webber) and Philip F. Moore, alleging violation of sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. 78j(b) and 78t(a), common law fraud, breach of fiduciary duties by a broker, professional negligence, and negligent supervision of a broker. The district court directed a verdict for the defendants. We reverse and remand for trial. 2 Events. On January 11, 1977 Jennie…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.