47 Fair empl.prac.cas. 355, 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,645 Nancy Fadhl v. City and County of San Francisco, Nancy Fadhl v. Police Department of the City and County of San Francisco

Good Law
804 F.2d 1097
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 20, 198685-2361California836 words

Opinion

Opinion

804 F.2d 1097 47 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 355 , 41 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 36,645 Nancy FADHL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellant. Nancy FADHL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. POLICE DEPARTMENT OF the CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 85-2361, 85-2541. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 17, 1986. Decided Nov. 20, 1986. Laura Stevens, Willdorf & Stevens, San Francisco, Cal., Guy T. Saperstein, Farnsworth, Saperstein & Seligman, Oakland, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Victoria Hobel, Philip S. Ward, City Attys. Office, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Before BROWNING, Chief Judge, FLETCHER and NELSON, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: 1 The City and County of San Francisco appeals from two judgments for damages and attorneys' fees entered by the district court on the remand ordered by this court in Fadhl v. City and County of San Francisco, 741 F.2d 1163, 1167 (9th Cir.1984) (Fadhl I ). We affirm the award of damages. We also affirm the base attorneys' fee award, reserving jurisdiction over the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.