Igor Lifshitz v. Walter Drake & Sons, Inc., and Etna Products Co., Inc., Igor Lifshitz, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Etna Products Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee

Good Law
806 F.2d 1426·1 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1254·22 Fed. R. Serv. 415·7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 16·1986 U.S. App. LEXIS 35098
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitDecember 30, 198685-6087California5,437 words

Opinion

Opinion

806 F.2d 1426 55 USLW 2422 , 1987 Copr.L.Dec. P 26,042 , 7 Fed.R.Serv.3d 16 , 1 U.S.P.Q.2d 1254 , 22 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 415 Igor LIFSHITZ, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. WALTER DRAKE & SONS, INC., et al., Defendants, and Etna Products Co., Inc., Defendant-Appellant. Igor LIFSHITZ, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant, v. ETNA PRODUCTS CO., INC., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-Appellee. Nos. 85-6087, 85-6130. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 4, 1986. Decided Dec. 30, 1986. Clinton T. Bailey, Beverly Hills, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Kathryn Tschopik, Los Angeles, Cal., Robert C. Faber, New York City, for defendant-appellant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before WALLACE, BOOCHEVER and KOZINSKI, Circuit Judges. WALLACE, Circuit Judge: 1 Etna Products Co., Inc. (Etna) appeals from the district court's denial of its motion for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict (j.n.o.v.) or for a new trial on Lifshitz's unfair competition claim. Etna also contends that the district court erred in denying its motion for a new trial because of improper instruction to the jury regarding Lifshitz's unfair…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.