STATEMENT OF FACTS

The facts regarding restitution are well summarized in the Minor’s opening brief. We will adopt the summary for convenience. The victim agreed the restitution review hearing was about her loss of income of approximately $5,000, which she received from the Victim Compensation Board. She was out of work for a whole year. State disability paid 50 percent of her wages and the victim compensation board paid another 23 percent. She provided documents showing lost wages and medical records

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified. 2 to the compensation board. Her doctor indicated she was able to work for three hours a day. Before the incident, the victim supplemented her income by creating costumes and fashion but that was just a “side hustle” and did not make income for her house. She had a “real job” which paid her $16 an hour. She is now partially blind and has an implant in her left eye. The victim did not know whether V.H. had a restraining order against her. However, according to Exhibit 3, a restraining order was obtained against her on February 17, 2017, before the incident in 2018, and was set to expire on February 17, 2022.

DISCUSSION

As we have noted, appellate counsel has filed a Wende brief and asks the court to review the record for error. To assist the court in its review and in compliance with Anders v. California (1967) 386 U.S. 738 (Anders), counsel has identified one issue that was considered in evaluating the potential merits of this appeal: Did the court err in ordering $24,730.10 in restitution to be paid to the Victim Compensation Board. We have reviewed the entire record as required by Wende and Anders. We have not discovered any arguable issues for reversal on appeal. Competent counsel has represented the Minor on this appeal.

3

DISPOSITION

The restitution order is affirmed.

HUFFMAN, J.

WE CONCUR:

BENKE, Acting P. J.

AARON, J.

4