Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan Pangilinan, Petitioners v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama Litonjua v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
809 F.2d 1449
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 13, 198781-5427California4,023 words

Opinion

Opinion

809 F.2d 1449 Re Naturalization of Antolin Punsalan PANGILINAN, et al., Petitioners- Appellants, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. Re Naturalization of Mario Valderrama LITONJUA, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent-Appellee. Nos. 80-4543, 81-5427. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Feb. 13, 1987. Simmons & Ungar and Donald I. Ungar, San Francisco, Cal., Baxley and Mautino and Robert A. Mautino, San Diego, Cal., for the petitioners-appellants. Lauri Steven Filppu, John T. Bannon, Jr., Marshall Tamor Golding and Frank O. Bowman, III, Washington, D.C., for the respondent-appellee. Before SCHROEDER, FLETCHER and NORRIS, Circuit Judges.ORDER 1 The panel, as constituted above, has unanimously voted to deny the petition for rehearing and to reject the suggestion for a rehearing en banc. 2 The full court has been advised of the suggestion for en banc rehearing and upon the vote of the eligible judges in active service, a majority failed to vote for en banc rehearing. 3 The petition for rehearing is DENIED, and the suggestion for a rehearing en banc is REJECTED. 4 KOZINSKI, Circuit Judge, with whom…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.