In Re Norma E. Worcester, Debtor. Irving Rosner and William Little v. Norma E. Worcester, Norma E. Worcester, Counter-Claimant v. Irving Rosner, Counter-Defendants

Good Law
811 F.2d 1224·16 Collier Bankr. Cas. 2d 589·7 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 733·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 2766
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitFebruary 26, 198784-5993California4,333 words

Opinion

Opinion

811 F.2d 1224 16 Collier Bankr.Cas.2d 589 , 7 Fed.R.Serv.3d 733 , Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,637 In re Norma E. WORCESTER, Debtor. Irving ROSNER and William Little, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Norma E. WORCESTER, Defendant-Appellant. Norma E. WORCESTER, Counter-Claimant, v. Irving ROSNER, et al., Counter-Defendants. No. 84-5993. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 4, 1986. Decided Feb. 26, 1987. As Amended on Denial of Rehearing or Decertification May 7, 1987. Kathleen Courts, Oakland, Cal., for defendant-appellant. Alfred Fadel, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee Rosner. Leon L. Vickman, Encino, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee Little. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before BOOCHEVER, NORRIS and HALL, Circuit Judges. CYNTHIA HOLCOMB HALL, Circuit Judge: 1 Norma E. Worcester appeals from the decision of the district court validating a California foreclosure sale of her residence and reversing a decision of the bankruptcy court. The district court held that Worcester failed to satisfy certain requirements under California law necessary to set aside a foreclosure action. Specifically, the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.