Nicholas Baker v. Andrew Saul

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 27, 202018-36072California1,917 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS NOV 27 2020

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NICHOLAS L. BAKER, No. 18-36072

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:17-cv-05720-JPD

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington James P. Donohue, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted September 3, 2020** Seattle, Washington

Before: McKEOWN and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges, and CALDWELL,*** District Judge.

Nicholas Baker appeals the district court’s affirmation of the Commissioner

of Social Security’s denial of his application for Social Security Disability benefits

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Karen K. Caldwell, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Kentucky,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.