Bechtel Construction, Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of America and San Diego District Council of Carpenters Local 1278, Unincorporated Association, and United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry and Local 230, Unincorporated Association, Defendant- Bechtel Construction, Inc., a Nevada Corporation v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America and San Diego District Council of Carpenters Local 2078, Unincorporated Associations, and the San Diego Pipe Trades Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee, an Unincorporated Association

Good Law
812 F.2d 1220
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 14, 198786-6064California3,485 words

Opinion

Opinion

812 F.2d 1220 124 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3076 , 27 Wage & Hour Cas. (BN 1722, 106 Lab.Cas. P 12,270 BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION, INC., Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS & JOINERS OF AMERICA and San Diego District Council of Carpenters Local 1278, Unincorporated Association, et al., Defendant, and United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipefitting Industry and Local 230, Unincorporated Association, Defendant- Appellant. BECHTEL CONSTRUCTION, INC., a Nevada Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA and San Diego District Council of Carpenters Local 2078, unincorporated associations, Defendant, and The San Diego Pipe Trades Joint Apprenticeship and Training Committee, an unincorporated association, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 86-6064, 86-6070. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 5, 1987. Decided March 17, 1987. As Amended April 14, 1987. Christopher J. Rillo, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee. Jeffrey P. Fuchsman, San Diego, Cal., for defendants-appellants. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.