Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg, Stephen Yagman and Yagman & Yagman, P.C. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg
Opinion
Opinion
815 F.2d 575 Jerry BROWN and Gerry Fleischer, Plaintiffs, v. Michael BADEN and Sidney Weinberg, Defendants. Stephen YAGMAN and Yagman & Yagman, P.C., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg, Respondents. No. 87-5549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1987. Decided April 22, 1987. Opinion on Rehearing June 26, 1987. Brian O'Neill and Frederick D. Friedman, Santa Monica, Cal. and Ramsey Clark, New York City, for petitioners. Donald C. Smaltz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Harvey A. Schneider, Woodland Hills, Cal. and Mark E. Beck, Los Angeles, Cal. for defendants. Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before ANDERSON, PREGERSON, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM: 1 The appeal from the district court's order to show cause of January 12, 1987 has been construed by us as a petition for writ of mandamus to compel compliance with our prior decision in this litigation. We grant the writ of mandamus, thereby directing enforcement of our previous decision that Chief Judge Real be…