Jerry Brown and Gerry Fleischer v. Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg, Stephen Yagman and Yagman & Yagman, P.C. v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg

Good Law
815 F.2d 575·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 5243
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 26, 198787-5549California1,125 words

Opinion

Opinion

815 F.2d 575 Jerry BROWN and Gerry Fleischer, Plaintiffs, v. Michael BADEN and Sidney Weinberg, Defendants. Stephen YAGMAN and Yagman & Yagman, P.C., Petitioners, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR the CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Michael Baden and Sidney Weinberg, Respondents. No. 87-5549. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 6, 1987. Decided April 22, 1987. Opinion on Rehearing June 26, 1987. Brian O'Neill and Frederick D. Friedman, Santa Monica, Cal. and Ramsey Clark, New York City, for petitioners. Donald C. Smaltz, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondents. Harvey A. Schneider, Woodland Hills, Cal. and Mark E. Beck, Los Angeles, Cal. for defendants. Petition for Writ of Mandamus from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before ANDERSON, PREGERSON, and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. ORDER PER CURIAM: 1 The appeal from the district court's order to show cause of January 12, 1987 has been construed by us as a petition for writ of mandamus to compel compliance with our prior decision in this litigation. We grant the writ of mandamus, thereby directing enforcement of our previous decision that Chief Judge Real be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.