United States v. Gustavo Alvarado, United States of America v. Oscar Oqueli-Hernandez

Good Law
817 F.2d 580·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6347
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 198785-5278, 85-5280California1,821 words

Opinion

Opinion

Anderson, J.

Gustavo Alvarado (Alvarado) and Oscar Oqueli-Hemandez (Oqueli) were indicted for conspiring to import (Count I), for importing (Count II), and for possessing with the intent to distribute (Count III), 12.7 kilograms of cocaine. A jury found both guilty on all counts. Alvarado and Oqueli sought a new trial charging that: 1) the trial judge gave an erroneous jury instruction, and 2) the prosecutor in his closing argument made false representations that warranted a mistrial. The court denied the motion and both were subsequently sentenced. Alvarado and Oqueli both appeal the trial court’s denial of their motions for a new trial.

I. FACTS

On July 22, 1986, Alvarado, Oqueli, Oqueli’s son Yuri, and Roberto Katan (Katan) arrived at the Los Angeles airport on a Varig Airlines flight from Brazil. At the luggage carousel, Oqueli picked up Alvarado’s suitcase and Yuri’s suitcase and proceeded through customs. Oqueli showed the customs agent a diplomatic pass, and the agent allowed Oqueli to pass through without being checked. Oqueli was General Consul for Honduras from January, 1984 to January, 1985. His diplomatic pass had expired with the termination of his post, but the customs agent…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.