17 soc.sec.rep.ser. 709, Medicare&medicaid Gu 36,299 Adams House Health Care, Adrian-Hillhaven Convalescent Center Alta Vista Healthcare Alvarado Convalescent and Rehabilitation Hospital Anaheim- Hillhaven Convalescent Andrew House Health Care Asheville-Hillhaven Rehabilitation and Convalescent Center Bancroft House Health Care Beverly West Convalescent Hospital Birchwood Terrace Health Care Birmingham- Hillhaven Convalescent Center Blueberry Hill Health Care Boca Raton Convalescent Center v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant- Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University Stanford University Hospital v. Otis R. Bowen, Secretary of Health and Human Services

Good Law
817 F.2d 587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 18, 198786-1872California3,968 words

Opinion

Opinion

817 F.2d 587 17 Soc.Sec.Rep.Ser. 709, Medicare&Medicaid Gu 36,299 ADAMS HOUSE HEALTH CARE, Adrian-Hillhaven Convalescent Center; Alta Vista Healthcare; Alvarado Convalescent and Rehabilitation Hospital; Anaheim- Hillhaven Convalescent; Andrew House Health Care; Asheville-Hillhaven Rehabilitation and Convalescent Center; Bancroft House Health Care; Beverly West Convalescent Hospital; Birchwood Terrace Health Care; Birmingham- Hillhaven Convalescent Center; Blueberry Hill Health Care; Boca Raton Convalescent Center, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant- Appellant, BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF the LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY; Stanford University Hospital, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 85-1512, 86-1872. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Dec. 12, 1986. Decided May 18, 1987. Robert J. Aamoth, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees in No. 85-1512. Sarah Willis Wilcox, Washington, D.C., for defendant-appellant in No. 85-1512. Rodney Johnson and Edmundo J. Moran, Stanford, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees in No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.