Charlotte Coats v. Stephen Woods Orange County Superior Court Jack Mandel James Cook Commissioner Evans Commissioner Fassell County of Orange Thomas H. Schulte Jane M. Egley United Fathers Henry J. Kohler William C. Armstrong Gail Armstrong Costa Mesa Police Department, Newport-Mesa School District, Charlotte Coats v. Stephen Woods, Orange County Superior Court Jack Mandel James Cook Commissioner Fassell County of Orange Thomas H. Schulte Jane M. Egley United Fathers Henry J. Kohler William C. Armstrong Gail Armstrong Costa Mesa Police Department Newport-Mesa School District

Good Law
819 F.2d 236·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 7221
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 5, 198786-5712California851 words

Opinion

Opinion

819 F.2d 236 Charlotte COATS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen WOODS; Orange County Superior Court; Jack Mandel; James Cook; Commissioner Evans; Commissioner Fassell; County of Orange; Thomas H. Schulte; Jane M. Egley; United Fathers; Henry J. Kohler; William C. Armstrong; Gail Armstrong; Costa Mesa Police Department, Newport-Mesa School District, Defendants-Appellees. Charlotte COATS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stephen WOODS, Orange County Superior Court; Jack Mandel; James Cook; Commissioner Fassell; County of Orange; Thomas H. Schulte; Jane M. Egley; United Fathers; Henry J. Kohler; William C. Armstrong; Gail Armstrong; Costa Mesa Police Department; Newport-Mesa School District, Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 86-5712, 86-6046. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1987. Decided June 5, 1987. Charlotte Coats, Santa Ana, Cal., plaintiff-appellant. David N. Kauth, Santa Ana, Cal., Kevin M. Tripi, Costa Mesa, Cal., Jeanne E. Emrich, Irvine, Cal., Bruce Fuhrer, Los Angeles, Cal., Brandt Caudill, Irvine, Cal., C. William Nyman, L. Thomas Krahelski, Santa Ana, Cal., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.