Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. Jim Whiteside, and Philip Brendale, Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation v. County of Yakima

Good Law
828 F.2d 529·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 12522
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 21, 198785-4316California4,241 words

Opinion

Opinion

828 F.2d 529 CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Jim WHITESIDE, et al., Defendants, and Philip Brendale, Defendant-Appellant. CONFEDERATED TRIBES AND BANDS OF the YAKIMA INDIAN NATION, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. COUNTY OF YAKIMA, et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 85-4316, 85-4433 and 85-4383. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 6, 1986. Decided Sept. 21, 1987. James B. Hovis, Yakima, Washington, for plaintiffs-appellants. Charles C. Flower, Jeffrey C. Sullivan, David A. Thompson, and Patrick Andreotti, Yakima, Washington, for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Washington. Before SKOPIL, FLETCHER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge: 1 The Confederated Tribes and Bands of the Yakima Indian Nation (Yakima Nation) brought these two cases in federal court seeking a declaratory judgment and an injunction barring the defendants from making or permitting any land use within the Yakima Indian Reservation that is contrary to the Amended Zoning Regulations of the Yakima Nation. In Whiteside I, 617 F.Supp. 735 , the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.