Richard Price and Joe Bridges v. Psa, Inc., Psa, Inc. v. United States District Court for the Southern District of California, Richard Price and Joe Bridges, Real Parties in Interest

Good Law
829 F.2d 871·126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2805·2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1357·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13207
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 6, 198786-5973California3,541 words

Opinion

Opinion

829 F.2d 871 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2805 , 56 USLW 2226 , 56 USLW 2279 , 107 Lab.Cas. P 10,158 , 2 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 1357 Richard PRICE and Joe Bridges, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. PSA, INC., Defendant-Appellant. PSA, INC., Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Richard Price and Joe Bridges, Real Parties in Interest. Nos. 86-5973, 86-7462. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 3, 1987. Decided Oct. 6, 1987. Marie Backes, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees-real parties in interest. Suzanne J. Holland, Bruce A. Gothelf and Robert J. Lanza, Meserve, Mumper & Hughes, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellant-petitioner. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. Before SNEED, FARRIS and NOONAN, Circuit Judges. SNEED, Circuit Judge: 1 PSA, Inc. (PSA) seeks review of the district court's remand of this case to state court. PSA alleges that the plaintiffs' state law wrongful discharge claims are completely preempted by the Railway Labor Act (RLA), 45 U.S.C. Sec. 151 et seq., and thus the district court had no discretion to remand the case once it…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.