Poling v. Morgan

Good Law
829 F.2d 882·4 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 974·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13198
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 198785-2711California3,061 words

Opinion

Opinion

829 F.2d 882 4 UCC Rep.Serv.2d 974 , 23 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1095 Orris POLING and Ruth Poling, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Max T. MORGAN and O.D. Morgan, husband and wife; Mobile Discount Corporation; Wheel Estates Corporation; Delta Service Corporation; Gulf Homes, Inc.; Western Coach Corp.; Delta Investment Corp.; E-Z Livin' Mobile Sales, Inc.; and Mobileservice Corp., AZ Corp.; Defendants-Appellees. No. 85-2711. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Jan. 15, 1987. Decided Oct. 7, 1987. L. Anthony Fines, Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiffs-appellants. Richard J. Hertzberg, Phoenix, Ariz., for defendants-appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. Before ANDERSON, SKOPIL and CANBY, Circuit Judges. SKOPIL, Circuit Judge: 1 This action arises from the sale of a mobile home, a subsequent default, and the eventual repossession and sale of the home. The district court granted partial summary judgment and entered a judgment on a jury's verdict in favor of defendants. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 2 Orris and Ruth Poling (the Polings) purchased a mobile home from…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.