Ghebreselassie v. Coleman Security Service

Good Law
829 F.2d 892·126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2717·2 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1399·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 13262
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 7, 198786-6490California3,899 words

Opinion

Opinion

829 F.2d 892 126 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2717 , 107 Lab.Cas. P 10,222 , 2 Indiv.Empl.Rts.Cas. 1399 Abraham GHEBRESELASSIE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. COLEMAN SECURITY SERVICE; Ronald Farwell; Herman Hendricks; Parking Concepts, Inc., Defendants-Appellees, California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees Local No. 911, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-Intervenor, and California Teamsters Public, Professional and Medical Employees Local No. 911, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America, Defendant-Cross-Claimant. No. 86-6490. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted May 4, 1987. Decided Oct. 7, 1987. James L. Brown, Supkoff and Brown, Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff-appellant Ghebreselassie. Robert Berchan, Booth, Mitchel, Strange & Smith, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendants-appellees Coleman Sec. Service, Ronald Farwell, and Herman Hendricks. Elaine Holland, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-appellee Parking Concepts. Robert D. Vogel, Los Angeles, Cal., for defendant-counter-claimant-intervenor California Teamsters Public,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.