United States v. Raimundo Crespo De Llano, United States of America v. George Antonio Rojas, United States of America v. Justina Garcia Dominguez, United States of America v. Santos Amable Dominguez-Peraza

Good Law
830 F.2d 1532
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 26, 198786-1361California7,516 words

Opinion

Opinion

830 F.2d 1532 23 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 1263 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raimundo CRESPO de LLANO, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Antonio ROJAS, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Justina GARCIA DOMINGUEZ, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Santos Amable DOMINGUEZ-PERAZA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 86-1361, 86-1362, 86-1372 and 86-1373. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Sept. 15, 1987. Decided Oct. 26, 1987. John S. Leonardo, Asst. U.S. Atty., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee. Bertram Polis, Tucson, Ariz., for defendants-appellants Dominguez and Dominguez-Peraza. Scott W. Schlievert, Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Rojas. Stephen G. Ralls, South Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant Crespo de Llano. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona (Tucson). Before CHOY, ALARCON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. ALARCON, Circuit Judge: 1 Raimundo Crespo de Llano (Crespo), George Antonio Rojas (Rojas), Justina Garcia Dominguez (Dominguez), and Santos Dominguez-Peraza…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.