Toner v. Lederle Laboratories

831 F.2d 180 David TONER, Guardian ad litem for Kevin TONER, an infant child, and David Toner and Susan Toner, husband and wife, individually, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. LEDERLE LABORATORIES, A DIVISION OF AMERICAN CYANAMID CO., a corporation, Defendant-Appellant. No. 84-3906. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Oct. 26, 1987. Elam, Burke, Evans, Boyd & Koontz, and Robert J. Koontz, Boise, Idaho, for defendant-appellant. Kenneth L. Pedersen and Curtis R. Webb, Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, Idaho, and Richard D. Poling, Charlotte, N.C., for plaintiffs-appellees. Before WRIGHT, KENNEDY and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. 1 Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho. ORDER 2 Upon consideration of the parties submissions, it appears there are certain erroneous or ambiguous statements in the first opinion of the court in this matter, Toner v. Lederle Laboratories, 779 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir.1986). 3 The opinion is amended by striking the last two sentences in the fifth paragraph, which state: 4 "Because of this difficulty, at the time of Kevin Toner's vaccination, the whole cell pertussis vaccine was the only pertussis vaccine…