United States v. Arturo Rodriguez-Rios

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202120-10352California788 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 12 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 20-10352

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:08-cr-01442-MHB-4 v.

ARTURO RODRIGUEZ-RIOS, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 10, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

Appellant Arturo Rodriguez-Rios appeals his sentences for Conspiracy to

Commit Hostage Taking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203; Hostage Taking in

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, sitting by designation. violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1203; and Harboring Illegal…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.