Thomas Erickson v. Susan Washburn
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202120-35100California727 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2021
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
THOMAS GERALD ERICKSON, No. 20-35100
Petitioner-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:12-cv-01466-IM
v.
MEMORANDUM*
SUSAN WASHBURN, Superintendent of Eastern Oregon Correctional Institution,
Respondent-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Karin J. Immergut, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted August 10, 2021** Seattle, Washington
Before: BEA, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.
Petitioner Thomas Erickson appeals the district court’s denial of his habeas
petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1291 and
2253(a), and we review the district court’s decision de novo. Boyer v. Belleque, 659
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). F.3d 957, 964 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.