David Bartenwerfer v. Kieran Buckley

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202120-60020California1,022 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

In re: DAVID WILLIAM No. 20-60020

BARTENWERFER; KATE MARIE

BARTENWERFER, BAP No. 19-1178

Debtors,

MEMORANDUM*

------------------------------

DAVID WILLIAM BARTENWERFER;

KATE MARIE BARTENWERFER,

Appellants,

v.

KIERAN BUCKLEY,

Appellee.

Appeal from the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate Panel Taylor, Faris, and Brand, Bankruptcy Judges, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 29, 2021 San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges, and HUCK,** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Paul C. Huck, United States District Judge for the U.S. District Court for Southern Florida, sitting by designation. David and Kate Bartenwerfer appeal the Ninth Circuit Bankruptcy Appellate

Panel’s (“BAP”) decision, which affirmed the bankruptcy court’s attorneys’ fees

award in favor of Kieran Buckley. We have…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.