Baljeet Sandhu v. Jefferson Sessions, III

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 12, 202119-17384California795 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 12 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BALJEET KAUR SANDHU, No. 19-17384

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:18-cv-05971-JSC

and

MEMORANDUM*

GURJEET KAUR,

Plaintiff,

v.

JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Jacqueline Scott Corley, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Submitted August 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: SILER,*** CHRISTEN, and FORREST, Circuit Judges.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eugene E. Siler, United States Circuit Judge for the Gurjeet Kaur and her adult daughter (Plaintiffs) filed a complaint in the district

court alleging that the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services’ (USCIS)

decision to revoke Kaur’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.