Cristina Nicolas-Pedro v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 13, 202120-70419California401 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 13 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CRISTINA NICOLAS-PEDRO; HENRY No. 20-70419

NICOLAS,

Agency Nos. A206-888-951 Petitioners, A206-888-950

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 11, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: EBEL,*** BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Petitioner Cristina Nicolas-Pedro and her minor child Henry seek review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals order dismissing their applications for asylum,

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable David M. Ebel, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. withholding of removal, and protection under the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.