United States v. Jesus Ramirez

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 202119-50360California1,067 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-50360

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:18-cr-04217-LAB-1 v.

JESUS ALFREDO RAMIREZ, AKA Chuy, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Larry A. Burns, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 5, 2021 Pasadena, California

Before: PAEZ, CALLAHAN, and HURWITZ, Circuit Judges.

Following a jury trial, Jesus Ramirez was convicted of conspiracy to distribute

methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 and 846; he received a below-

Guidelines sentence of twenty years. We affirm the conviction and sentence.

1. Ramirez argues that the district court erred both procedurally and

substantively in finding that the affidavit offered by the government in support of a

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. wiretap warrant1 contained “a full…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.