Dong Huang v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 202120-71879California715 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DONG JIM HUANG, AKA Dong Jin No. 20-71879 Huang, Agency No. A209-153-121 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 12, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: BEA, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Dong Huang petitions for review of the agency’s determinations that she: (1)

lacked credibility, (2) failed to establish an objectively reasonable fear of

persecution, and (3) waived her claim for relief under the Convention Against

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252(a)(1) over Petitioner’s

first two claims, but we lack jurisdiction over her CAT claim.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.