Cathy Goodman v. Mpi Health Plan

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 16, 202120-55937California914 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 16 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CATHY L. GOODMAN and LYLE No. 20-55937

P. ROBBINS,

D.C. No. 2:19-cv-03215-JFW-PJW Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MOTION PICTURE INDUSTRY HEALTH

PLAN FOR ACTIVE PARTICIPANTS,

Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California John Walter, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted July 29, 2021** Pasadena, California

Before: M. SMITH, LEE, Circuit Judges, and ROBRENO***, District Judge.

Cathy Goodman and Lyle Robbins (“Goodman”) appeal from the district

court’s entry of judgment in favor of the Motion Picture Industry Health Plan in this

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Eduardo C. Robreno, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.