Eskenazi

Eskenazi v. 310 Culver CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 16, 2021B302398California4,056 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 8/16/21 Eskenazi v. 310 Culver CA2/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

JACK ESKENAZI, B302398

Plaintiff, Cross-defendant (Los Angeles County and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. BC673069)

v.

310 CULVER, LLC et al.,

Defendant, Cross- complainant and Respondent.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Ramona G. See, Judge. Affirmed. Tatone Law, Michelangelo Tatone and Stephen Ruotsi for Plaintiff, Cross-defendant and Appellant Jack Eskenazi. Delman Vukmanovic, John Vukmanovic and Dana Delman, for Defendant, Cross-complainant and Respondent 310 Culver,

LLC.

No appearance by Plaintiff and Respondent Coby Halavais. _______________ Jack Eskenazi…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.