United States v. Cirilo Viramontes-Ruiz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202117-10305California638 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 17-10305

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:16-cr-00063-MMD-VPC-1 v.

CIRILO VIRAMONTES-RUIZ, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Nevada Miranda M. Du, Chief District Judge, Presiding

Submission Deferred July 10, 2018 Submitted August 13, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER and TALLMAN, Circuit Judges, and LEMELLE,*** District Judge.

In 2017, Defendant Cirilo Viramontes-Ruiz appealed his sentence of twelve

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Ivan L.R. Lemelle, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Louisiana, sitting by designation. months’ imprisonment and three years of supervised release…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.