Rene Severiano-Badillo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202119-73115California489 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 17 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

RENE SEVERIANO-BADILLO, No. 19-73115

Petitioner, Agency No. A094-951-130

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 12, 2021** Seattle, Washington

Before: BEA, BRESS, and VANDYKE, Circuit Judges.

Rene Severiano-Badillo, a native and citizen of Mexico, illegally entered the

United States and was ordered removed in 2011. He reentered illegally and was

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). apprehended and ordered removed again by reinstatement of his 2011 removal

order. He now appeals the constitutionality of the Department of Homeland

Security’s (“DHS”) removal process.

We review constitutional questions de novo. See Garcia de Rincon v.

DHS, 539 F.3d…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.