Francisco Nepamuceno Olivo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202120-70903California913 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

FRANCISCO NEPAMUCENO OLIVO, No. 20-70903

Petitioner, Agency No. A087-765-034

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted August 13, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: McKEOWN, FORREST, and BUMATAY, Circuit Judges. Concurrence by Judge BUMATAY

Francisco Nepamuceno Olivo, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for

review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal from

the Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his application for cancellation of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b)(1). Because we lack jurisdiction over

Nepamuceno Olivo’s petition, we dismiss…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.