Eko Brands, LLC v. Adrian Rivera Maynez Enters.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202120-35369California1,362 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 17 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

EKO BRANDS, LLC, No. 20-35369

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00894-TSZ

v.

MEMORANDUM*

ADRIAN RIVERA MAYNEZ

ENTERPRISES, INC.; ADRIAN RIVERA,

Defendants-Appellants.

EKO BRANDS, LLC, No. 20-35556

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:17-cv-00894-TSZ

v.

ADRIAN RIVERA MAYNEZ

ENTERPRISES, INC.; ADRIAN RIVERA,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Thomas S. Zilly, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted August 4, 2021 Anchorage, Alaska

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: WARDLAW, MILLER, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Adrian Rivera Maynez Enterprises, Inc., and Adrian Rivera (collectively,

ARM) appeal the district court’s judgment in favor of Eko Brands, LLC (Eko) and

award of disgorgement of ARM’s profits in this Lanham Act case. On…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.