David Meyberg v. City of Santa Cruz

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202120-16229California1,236 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

AUG 17 2021

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID MEYBERG; NEW SANTA CRUZ No. 20-16229

SURF SCHOOL, LLC,

D.C. No. 5:19-cv-00700-NC Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v. MEMORANDUM*

CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; CAROL

SCURICH, individually and as Director of Santa Cruz City Department of Parks and Recreation; ED GUZMAN; RICK MARTINEZ, Chief Deputy of Santa Cruz Police Department; JEFFREY AULDRIGE;

LEE BUTLER; ERIC MARLATT; ALEX

KHOURNY; DONALD TIMOTEO;

ADAM BAKER; LAURA LANDRY; JOE

GRANDA; NANCY CONCEPCION;

JACOB RODRIGUEZ; RICHARD

SUCHOMEL; CLUB ED, INC.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted July 9, 2021** San Francisco, California

Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.

After the City of Santa Cruz refused to issue an operating permit to his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.