David Meyberg v. City of Santa Cruz
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 17, 202120-16229California1,236 words
Opinion
Opinion
FILED
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
AUG 17 2021
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DAVID MEYBERG; NEW SANTA CRUZ No. 20-16229
SURF SCHOOL, LLC,
D.C. No. 5:19-cv-00700-NC Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v. MEMORANDUM*
CITY OF SANTA CRUZ; CAROL
SCURICH, individually and as Director of Santa Cruz City Department of Parks and Recreation; ED GUZMAN; RICK MARTINEZ, Chief Deputy of Santa Cruz Police Department; JEFFREY AULDRIGE;
LEE BUTLER; ERIC MARLATT; ALEX
KHOURNY; DONALD TIMOTEO;
ADAM BAKER; LAURA LANDRY; JOE
GRANDA; NANCY CONCEPCION;
JACOB RODRIGUEZ; RICHARD
SUCHOMEL; CLUB ED, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Nathanael M. Cousins, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Submitted July 9, 2021** San Francisco, California
Before: GRABER, MURGUIA, and LEE, Circuit Judges.