McClure

People v. McClure

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 17, 2021H048280California6,325 words

Opinion

Opinion

Manoukian, J.

I. INTRODUCTION

In 2017, after initially having been charged with willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder (Pen. Code, § 187, subd. (a))1, defendant Julie Ann McClure pleaded no contest to voluntary manslaughter (§ 192, subd. (a)) and 11 other crimes pursuant to a plea agreement. The superior court imposed an agreed-upon determinate sentence of 25 years. In 2020, defendant filed a petition for resentencing pursuant to section 1170.95, which was enacted through the passage of Senate Bill No. 1437 (2017-2018 Reg. Sess.) (Senate Bill 1437). (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, § 4.) Senate Bill 1437 “amend[ed] the felony murder rule and the natural and probable consequences doctrine . . . to ensure that murder liability is not imposed on a person who is not the actual killer, did not act with the intent to kill, or was not a major participant of the underlying felony who acted with reckless indifference to human life.” (Stats. 2018, ch. 1015, § 1, subd. (f).) It added

1 All further statutory references are to the Penal Code unless otherwise specified. section 1170.95 to allow individuals “convicted of felony murder or murder under a natural and probable consequences theory” to petition…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.