Vincent L. Chalk v. United States District Court Central District Of California

Good Law
832 F.2d 1158·1 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 1166·44 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 37,502·45 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 517·1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 15170
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitNovember 18, 198787-6418California653 words

Opinion

Opinion

832 F.2d 1158 45 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. 517 , 44 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 37,502 , 56 USLW 2322 , 1 A.D. Cases 1166 Vincent L. CHALK, Petitioner-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent, Orange County Superintendent of Schools, also known as Orange County Department of Education, and Robert Peterson, in his official capacity, Real Parties in Interest/Respondents. No. 87-6418. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Nov. 10, 1987. Decided Nov. 18, 1987. Paul L. Hoffman, Susan D. McGreivy, Mickey J. Wheatley, Jon W. Davidson, Christine A. Littleton, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, Los Angeles, Cal., Marjorie Rushforth, Georgia Garrett-Norris, Garrett-Norris & Rushforth, Joel J. Loquvam, Joan K. Honeycutt, Jack C. Francis, Santa Ana, Cal., for petitioner-appellant. Ronald D. Wenkart, Costa Mesa, Cal., for respondents. 1 Elizabeth H. Esty, Sidley & Austin, Washington D.C., Kirk B. Johnson, Martin J. Hatlie, Chicago, Ill., for amicus American Medical Ass'n. 2 John Van de Kamp, Atty. Gen., and M. Anne Jennings, Deputy Atty. Gen., Andrea Sheridan Ordin, Asst. Atty. Gen., Marian M. Johnston, Supervising Deputy…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.