Espinoza

Espinoza v. Ponce CA4/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaAugust 18, 2021D078096California5,331 words

Opinion

Opinion

Guerrero, J.

Filed 8/18/21 Espinoza v. Ponce CA4/

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

STATE OF CALIFORNIA

ROSALINA ESPINOZA et al., D078096

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Super. Ct. No. ECU000118)

v.

JOSE PONCE et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Imperial County, Jeffrey B. Jones, Judge. Affirmed. Law Office of Elliott Kanter and Elliott Kanter for Plaintiffs and Appellants. The Viviano Law Firm, Charles A. Viviano; Blain Morrison Law Corporation and Rebecca Blain Morrison for Defendants and Respondents. Rosalina Espinoza, Sylvia Espinoza, and Jesus Espinoza (collectively, plaintiffs) brought a personal injury action against the Imperial Irrigation District (IID), a government entity, and its employee, Jose…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.