Van Pounds v. Cameron Smith

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 18, 202120-35154California1,885 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS AUG 18 2021

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VAN POUNDS, No. 20-35154

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 6:19-cv-00420-MK

v.

MEMORANDUM*

CAMERON SMITH, individually and in his official capacity; et al.,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon Ann L. Aiken, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted July 6, 2021 Portland, Oregon

Before: M. MURPHY,** PAEZ, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

Plaintiff-Appellant Van Pounds appeals the district court’s order dismissing

his complaint with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be

granted. The district court adopted the magistrate judge’s findings and

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Michael R. Murphy, United States Circuit Judge for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation. recommendation, which found that Pounds failed to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.